Call of Duty: Black Ops 6’s Squid Game crossover is successful its 2nd week and dredging up familiar, thorny questions astir nan series’ microtransactions.
As players tally astir nan virtual battlefield of Black Ops 6 and Warzone dressed arsenic not only Squid Game contestants but nan masked-up soldiers who support them successful line, nan Call of Duty organization is questioning Activision’s fierce monetization of its hugely celebrated money-spinner.
Fans had already deed retired astatine nan Squid Game arena pass, which includes a paid premium track. Call of Duty has ne'er locked arena rewards down a paywall before, and this 1,100 CP ($9.99) conflict walk wrong a conflict walk has surely proven controversial.
Call of Duty's Pink Guards Tracer Pack costs 2,800 CP, aliases astir $24.Now, nan first Squid Game premium bundle is connected sale, and arsenic expected, it’s expensive. The 2,800 CP ($24) bundle includes 3 caller skins (the triangle, circle, and quadrate Squid Game workers), 2 limb skins, and different integer gubbins. 2,800 CP is in-line pinch immoderate of nan astir costly bundles Call of Duty already offers, but there’s much than nan up-front costs present that’s upsetting fans.
The 3 Squid Game operators included are each restricted to nan aforesaid “side.” This intends that successful Black Ops 6 Multiplayer, you only usage them if you’re connected nan Crimson One team. So, it whitethorn beryllium nan lawsuit that you person a tally of games successful which you can’t usage nan tegument you’ve paid for.
While this makes consciousness connected 1 manus (having these skins disposable for usage connected some sides would astir apt create ocular confusion), Call of Duty players person expressed vexation astatine nan restriction. “2,800 COD Points for operators connected nan aforesaid faction... Can’t moreover usage much than 1 astatine a time,” redditor mrdounut101 complained.
I’ve seen galore acquainted antagonistic arguments popular up successful consequence to this complaint. Just don’t bargain Call of Duty skins, immoderate say. If you do, you're portion of nan problem. Some can’t understand why anyone would bargain a Call of Duty worker tegument successful nan first place, fixed nan crippled is first-person.
Unlike, for example, Fortnite, which is third-person and frankincense lets you spot your characteristic during gameplay, Call of Duty only lets you spot your characteristic skin’s hands and forearms arsenic you’re fighting, aliases successful their entirety during executions. Black Ops 6’s Winner’s Circle, itself nan attraction of immoderate vexation wrong nan community, shows disconnected your skins successful each their glory after nan extremity of a Multiplayer match. Activision surely knows what it’s doing here.
Players are besides complaining that Black Ops 6 is presently packed pinch players wearing Squid Game skins, but that was inevitable. For a start, 1 of nan skins made disposable arsenic portion of this arena is free to each players, truthful that was ever going to beryllium a celebrated option, particularly fixed nan internet's obsession pinch Squid Game itself. Squid Game has overrun Call of Duty, yes, but it will pass.
Inevitably we get astatine nan endpoint of nan Call of Duty microtransaction debate: Activision monetizes nan crippled for illustration it’s free-to-play, for illustration it’s Fortnite, and while that’s existent for Warzone players, it very overmuch is not for Black Ops 6 players, astir of whom person forked retired astatine slightest $70 conscionable to commencement playing Multiplayer aliases Zombies.
This gets to nan rumor astatine nan bosom of Call of Duty and why it continues to bring successful hundreds of millions of dollars done microtransactions alongside nan immense magnitude of money generated by income of nan crippled itself. Activision has created this cross-progression monetization strategy that intends nan free-to-play Warzone has nan aforesaid microtransactions arsenic nan $70 Black Ops 6. But players do not needfully play some games. If you play Black Ops 6 Multiplayer only, for example, a cosmetics bundle that costs a 3rd of nan afloat value of nan crippled is astir apt going to consciousness unfairly expensive. But if you play Warzone only, past you astir apt consciousness for illustration nan value is justified.
And past there’s each nan positions in-between. Perhaps you play some games. How do you consciousness astir nan monetization then? Perhaps you play Black Ops 6 via your Game Pass subscription. Are nan microtransactions bully worth for you now? Did you salary other for nan BlackCell type of nan premium conflict pass? If so, possibly you consciousness all nan Squid Game arena walk rewards should beryllium yours without having to manus complete moreover much cash.
It really does consciousness for illustration Activision is pushing nan bound of what it tin get distant pinch erstwhile it comes to nan costs of Call of Duty cosmetics. In truth, nan mega patient has added caller types of conflict passes and bundles aggregate times complete nan years. But now Call of Duty is successful nan hands of Microsoft and nan unit is connected Phil Spencer to present a return connected that immense $69 cardinal acquisition, fans will apt find themselves having to contend pinch moreover much caller and perchance arguable types of monetization arsenic they struggle to amended their K/D ratio. The Squid Game arena walk is astir apt conscionable nan beginning.
Wesley is nan UK News Editor for IGN. Find him connected Twitter astatine @wyp100. You tin scope Wesley astatine wesley_yinpoole@ign.com aliases confidentially astatine wyp100@proton.me.
English (US) · 
Indonesian (ID) ·